Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
Project |
Subprojects |
Description |
Notes |
Estimate of Work |
|
Tririga Upgrades |
|
Benefit:
- Overhaul of the user experience. Consumer web site type of look and feel.
- Work scheduling
- One platform for project and work order management
Project Scope:
- Upgrade FACserv application and platform to 10.
- Upgrade Projects 8i application and platform to 10.
- Merge Projects 8i and FACserv
- Licensing extension until Projects 8i is upgraded and merged
|
Challenges
- Realtime copy of Tririga database (data warehouse) is end of life.
- Entire project take approx. a year to complete. What this means for current and pending work and bug fixes.
- Reassessment of all customizations, with the goal of getting as close to OOB as possible.
|
2 FTE for 1 year |
|
|
data warehouse short term solution |
Remove all dependencies to existing data warehouse |
|
tbd |
|
|
data warehouse long term solution |
Provide a unified and clean view of Facilities data
Benefits:
- Ability to remove some of the customizations from Tririga.
- Provide analytical and transactional reporting across the organization for internal and campus use.
- Consolidate Fleet billing
|
Requirement for removing existing customizations out of Tririga.
- Creation of new unified data store for Facilities data.
- Remote access protocol
- Applications for accessing the data, which can be accessible from FACserv.
|
tbd. Needs to be done in parallel with Tririga upgrades. |
|
|
Performance Improvement Groups |
|
Recommend shift of focus to leading the upgrade process from the business perspective |
|
|
|
Analytical Reporting |
Incorporate into data warehouse solution |
|
|
|
Paperless Timesheet Processing |
|
Define scope of project:
- Paperless process
- Implementation of work schedules, which will automate overtime calculations and simplify the timesheet.
Business Value:
- Eliminates cost of DDM to scan and enter timesheets, retain scanned copies, and Facilities rework due to errors.
- Eliminates cost of paper and ink
- Eliminates cost of physically moving and tracking timesheets from off North Campus locations
- Reduce time spent for payroll calculation
- More timely billing - time will get into the system faster
- Users will be able to view timesheets.
|
- DDM does not have adequate controls for their part of the process.
- Additional payroll controls needed
|
Depends on project scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Management |
|
Scope and direction needs to be determined. Will each shop become an inventory location. Will supervisors become inventory managers? |
- Get Grainger inventory and ids into FACserv
- If each shop is to be an inventory location, pilot with Sign shop.
|
tbd |
|
Asset Tracking and Management |
|
Recommend putting on hold and concentrating on the following:
- FDX expansion to include all space
- Incremental delivery of assets. Populate FACserv with just the basic asset information. No customizations to FACserv and provides general asset tracking. Does not include inspections and fine grained asset tracking.
|
|
FDX expansion. 1 FTE for 6 weeks |
|
iPool replacement |
|
Vendor could fold at any time |
- Build vs. buy.
- Can fleet management be done in FACserv. It would have to be done around the upgrade schedule because FACserv will be frozen.
- Purchase the source code. This will provide a temporary solution until the upgrade is completed and/or a long term solution is found.
|
tbd |
|