Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Enterprise Authorization Grouper/Signet Evaluation


 Proof of Concept Setup and Customizations

  • Wrote WebAuth custom authentication filters
  • Use AdCom LDAP as subject identity store
  • Used Grouper WS and regular Grouper API to load and reload the AdCom FS hierarchy
  • Used Grouper+Signet to inherit Group privileges to an individual

 Comparisons to SAMS

  • Signet privileges are analogous to SAMS functions
  • Signet scope can be used to model SAMS hierarchies (with different subtrees for Payroll, FS, Academic hierarchies, etc)
  • Can be extended to include resources in the Authz model (i.e. does user X have access to function y over objects 1,2 and 3 within limits a,b,c etc)

Pros of Grouper/Signet

  • Privileges can be granted to Groups rather than just individuals.
  • Great data model
  • Easy to use API
  • Grouper WS is adequate

Cons of Grouper/Signet

  • No Signet WS so far
  • Grouper WS is still in alpha

Questions

  •  Can a user extend Group inherited privileges?
  • No labels