Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Agenda:

  • Handling of student employees
  • Sharing of code, data & content
    • code update notifications
    • user support
  • Sharing/pooling programming resources & expertise
  • Producing aggregated search results
  • Possible solutions:
    • Possibility of merging the two projects into one portal service -- pros and cons
    • other solutions/approaches

Issues:

  • User populations that cross boundaries:
    • Student employees
    • Faculty
  • Aggregating search results
  • Announcement double-entry
  • Calendar sharing
  • Common code & libraries

Proposed solutions:

  • Merge two portals into one with different "store fronts":

    Pros

    Cons

    Seamless user experience

    What to use host name, logo, etc?

    Sharing of code & accessing shared libraries is easier

    May have too many tabs/fragments to load

    One set of announcements, no duplication

    May have too many tabs to display

    Unified look and feel

    We may want different looks for SNAP and student portal

    Leverage the technical and hardware resources

    Which community controls the announcements, layout, look, etc?

    Redundancy

    Differences in design philosophies

    Aggregated search results

    Increased usage load

    Best practices

    Governance/control/decision making?

  • Shared database:
    • Common user lists, groups, announcements, channels, permissions store
    • Allows us to setup the two portals as backups for each other (possibly?)
    • SNAP would have to move to MySQL: a big job, but doable
  • Somehow link the databases
  • Setup data feeds (may only be possible in batch mode)
  • Make AdCom code and libraries available with update notifications
  • Make Student Portal code and libraries available with update notifications
  • No labels