The OIT Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is an important guideline to use when developing systems or implementing third-party solutions. In addition to helping implement more robust and secure systems for UCI, it also helps address future audits of IT systems by providing the procedures and documentation required to meet the expectations of the auditors.
The SDLC described here is meant to provide a flexible set of guidelines that can be adapted to any project by tailoring the steps, processes, and procedures to meet specific needs of a project. For more information, see Tailoring the SDLC. An overview diagram of the entire process can be downloaded in PDF or Microsoft Visio 2010 format.
Waterfall vs Scrum
Both Waterfall and Scrum are widely used models in SDLC with their respective pros and cons. Although most projects adopt one methodology over the other, the non-traditional hybrid method of using parts of each methodology can also be effective in arrive at the desired project outcome. Table below provides some characteristics of both Waterfall and Scrum. Detailed information on each methodologies tailored for OIT can be found in the following links.
| Waterfall | Scrum | |
|---|---|---|
| Fundamental Assumptions | Systems are fully specifiable, predictable, and can be build through meticulous and extensive planning. | High-quality, adaptive software can be developed by small teams using principles of continuous design improvement and testing based on rapid feedback and change. |
| Control | Process centric | People centric |
| Management Style | Command-and-control | Leadership-and-collaboration |
| Knowledge Management | Explicit | Tacit |
| Role Assignment | Individual - favors specialization | Self-organizing teams - encourages role interchangeability |
| Communication | Formal | Informal |
| Customer's Role | Important | Critical |
| Project Cycle | Guided by tasks or activities | Guided by product features |
| Development Model | Life cycle model | Evolutionary delivery model |
| Desired Organizational Structure | Mechanistic (bureaucratic with high formalization) | Organic (flexible and participative, encouraging cooperative social action) |