Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Table of Contents

Agenda

...

  • Possible co-habitation solutions
  • Action plan

Issues

...

  • User populations that cross boundaries:
    • Student employees
    • Postdocs
    • Faculty
      *"Store fronts" and naming - how do people know which one to go to?
  • Look-n-feel
  • Governance in general
  • Aggregating search results
  • Announcements (double-entry)
  • Calendar sharing
  • Sharing of code, data & content
    • code update notifications
    • portlet sharing
    • user support

Proposed solutions

...

  • Merge two portals into one (possibly with different "store fronts"):

...

  • Shared database:
    • Common user lists, groups, announcements, channels, permissions store
    • Allows us to setup the two portals as backups for each other (possibly?)
    • SNAP would have to move to MySQL: a big job, but doable
  • Somehow link the databases
  • Setup data feeds (may only be possible in batch mode)
  • Make AdCom code and libraries available with update notifications
  • Make Student Portal code and libraries available with update notifications

Minutes

...

  • Proposed action items:
    • By December, 2008:
      • 2 separate instances running
      • upgrade SNAP's code base to uPortal v 3.x
      •  discontinue support for IE6(question)
      • reorganize content in SNAP, reduce the number of default tabs
      • enable portlets in SNAP
      • rename portals to ZotPortal
      • create a "store front" -- once a user authenticates, s/he will be redirected to the appropriate portal; for users who belong to more than one audience, the store-front will ask them which portal they prefer to go to and save their choice.   Both portal will provide ways to navigate from one to another
      • identify common tools: e.g. library, calendar, maps, safety, email, travel, etc.
    • Evaluate possibilities of merging by May, 2009